12. februar 2012, 10:55

Hovsa NASA

Debat > Generelt > Overordnet om klimaændringer > Hovsa NASA

10-08-2007 23:31	Hovsa NASA
GLAR (1016)	http://www.180grader.dk/nyheder/NASA_indr_mmer_temperaturfejl.php Et år 2000 problem i 1998......NU er du pludselig 1934 der er det varmeste år i sidste århundrede ? Findes der mon andre fejl i beregningerne ? Det passer jo meget godt med at det var varmere i 1930-40'erne end det er i dag. Klima tips: Undgå sex i lukkede rum - du forgifter din partner med CO2 Redigeret d. 10-08-2007 23:33
11-08-2007 07:38
rick_uk (1069)	Flere detaljer her: "1934 and all that" (10/8-07)- http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/08/1934-and-all-that/ Historien i sammenhæng. "...However, there is clearly a latent and deeply felt wish in some sectors for the whole problem of global warming to be reduced to a statistical quirk or a mistake. This lead to some truly death-defying leaping to conclusions when this issue hit the blogosphere. One of the worst examples (but there are others) was the 'Opinionator' at the New York Times (oh dear). He managed to confuse the global means with the continental US numbers, he made up a story about McIntyre having 'always puzzled about some gaps' (what?), declared the the error had 'played havoc' with the numbers, and quoted another blogger saying that the 'astounding' numbers had been 'silently released'. None of these statements are true. Among other incorrect stories going around are that the mistake was due to a Y2K bug or that this had something to do with photographing weather stations. Again, simply false. But hey, maybe the Arctic will get the memo." Vh rick Vi har hørt varslerne. Klokken tikker....Informerede valg.

Har du en holdning til dét, du lige har læst? Vi er altid på udkig efter flere aktive debattører og ser frem til, at du også bliver en del af debatten! Selv små indspark bidrager til en levende diskussion ...

Seneste debat

Gæsteafstemning

Information

Klummen

Nyt fra Ing.dk