12. februar 2012, 14:07

Hvad mon det betyder ?

Debat > Klimavidenskab > Forklaringer på klimaændringer > Hvad mon det betyder ?

19-03-2010 21:09	Hvad mon det betyder ?
GLAR (1016)	http://www.thegwpf.org/the-observatory/675-sun-will-not-save-us-from-global-warming.html The climate model used in the paper predicts an average temperature rise of 0.23 and 0.20 deg C per decade between 2000 and 2030. However, since it is not mentioned in the paper that the average rise observed between 2000 and 2010 is zero this implies a 0.33 deg C per decade rise for the next two decades. This means that the next 20 years will see more warming in absolute terms and at a faster rate than in the post – 1880 thermometer period. Since we have had only about 0.4 deg rises in the past 70 years I maintain that, whatever the models predict, such an increase is unlikely. Nu taler forskerne om absolutte terms og måske endda om absolutte værdier abs(x), så kan jeg bedre forstå at det bliver varmere og varmere. Et absolut tal kan ikke være negativt. Sidste gang jeg hørte om mærkelige absolutte tal var da Statsminister Poul Schlytter holdt sin tale til Nationen, hin nytårsdag... Hvor han sagde om statsbudgettets elendige tilstand "Når vi ser på de absolutte tal, ser det hele meget positivt ud"
19-03-2010 21:24
GLAR (1016)	Jeg har lige modtaget følgende meddelelse.... Hvor er Keith Briffa forsvundet hen ? I just tried to find University of East Anglia researcher Keith Briffa on Wikipedia, and he was no where to be found! The following cached page was available through Yahoo: http://74.6.146.127/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&p=Keith+Briffa&type=302398&fr=chr-greentree_ff&u=en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_R._Briffa&w=keith+briffa&d=FViXB-_EUdEK&icp=1&.intl=us&sig=JqExiGPkjjNw4VxHijBlfw-- It sugests that he must have been removed because of his association with ClimateGate. Apparently Wikipedia does not want to make it easy to research the principle players in this scandal and learn the details of their involvement. It is a scandal in itself when a supposedly neutral reference is so deliberately obstructive and biased.

Har du en holdning til dét, du lige har læst? Vi er altid på udkig efter flere aktive debattører og ser frem til, at du også bliver en del af debatten! Selv små indspark bidrager til en levende diskussion ...

Seneste debat

Gæsteafstemning

Information

Klummen

Nyt fra Ing.dk