Klimadebat.dk | Dansk forum om klima og energi 
 
 Oprettelse | Kodeord?
23. maj 2012, 13:20 English

Klimaforker svarer Monkton igen...

Debat > Klimavidenskab > Forklaringer på klimaændringer > Klimaforker svarer Monkton igen...



22-09-2010 09:25Klimaforker svarer Monkton igen...
rick_uk

Ingen avatar

Rank: 4/5
(1121)

Climate scientists respond.

Leading scientists have filed THIS DOCUMENT to Congress refuting the claims made by climate sceptic Lord Christopher Monckton.

A coalition of leading climate scientists yesterday filed a 48-page document to the US Congress refuting an attack on climate science made earlier this year by the Ukip deputy leader, Lord Christopher Monckton.

The detailed rebuttal addresses nine key scientific claims made by Monckton, a prominent climate sceptic, to a house select committee hearing in May. It includes the responses of 21 climate scientists who variously conclude that Monckton's assertions are "very misleading", "profoundly wrong", "simply false", "chemical nonsense", and "cannot be supported by climate physics".

His testimony included claims that increasing ocean acidification is not due to rising CO2 levels, that recent decades of warming were due to global brightening as opposed to rising CO2 levels, and that there is nothing unusual about recent rises in global temperatures. He concluded his testimony by stating that anthropogenic climate change is a "non-problem" and that the correct policy response was "to do nothing".

"For those without some familiarity with climate science, [Monckton's] testimony may appear to have scientific validity," said yesterday's response to Monckton's claims . "We have therefore undertaken the task of soliciting responses from highly qualified climate scientists in each of the areas touched upon in Monckton's testimony ... In all cases, Monckton's assertions are shown to be without merit – they are based on a thorough misunderstanding of the science of climate change."

KILDE: 'Chemical nonsense': Leading scientists refute Lord Monckton's attack on climate science (21/9-10)


Vh rick

Vi har hørt varslerne. Klokken tikker....Informerede valg.
Redigeret d. 22-09-2010 09:27
21-02-2011 00:30RE: Potholer54 tager Monckton under (u)kærlig behandlig
teralaser

Ingen avatar

Rank: 0/5
(16)

Potholer65, som er en Britisk journalist, der specielt er efter religiøse fantaster og "klima fuppere", har lavet et par videoer om Monckton:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbW-aHvjOgM

og

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTY3FnsFZ7Q
22-02-2011 14:14
helios

Ingen avatar

Rank: 2/5
(210)

Den "tilbagevisning" skal nok tages med nogen forbehold.
Mann havde nok succes med sin Hockeystick-terori, som han promoverede i TAR, men holdt ikke til et nærmere gennemsyn.
James Hansen er ikke klimaforsker, har er uddannet fysiker/matematiker. Han efterlader sig en lang liste over forkerte klimaprognoser, der slår Monckton med flere længder. I følge James Hansen skulle Hudsonfloden allerede have oversvømmet gaden nedenfor Hansens residens - det har gadens beboere imidlertid ikke set noget til.
Jeg ser ingen tilbagevisning af hans pointe vedrørende albedoen - ca. 11 min. inde i videoen.
Der er flere end Monckton, der har et forklaringsproblem. Hvordan ligger det nu lige med IPCCs prognose vedrørende temperaturstigning og CO2-koncentration? I følge den skulle der være en lineær stigning siden 1998 og frem - i stedet ses en stagnation i temperaturen medens CO2 fortsætter opad.




Send svar Nyt emne


Deltag i debatten som aktiv debattør og del din holdning til emnet Klimaforker svarer Monkton igen... med forummets mange læsere.
 
Seneste debat
 
Klummen
 
Nyt fra Ing.dk
 
Gæsteafstemning
 
Copyright © 2007-2012 Klimadebat.dk | Dansk forum om klima, energi og global opvarmning