Seneste avisartikler om klimadebatten

Lima, Peru, 10 December 2014 - Greenpeace releases the following apology about the Nazca Lines protest on December 8th:

Without reservation Greenpeace apologises to the people of Peru for the offence caused by our recent activity laying a message of hope at the site of the historic Nazca Lines. We are deeply sorry for this.

We fully understand that this looks bad. Rather than relay an urgent message of hope and possibility to the leaders gathering at the Lima UN climate talks, we came across as careless and crass.

We have now met with the Peruvian Culture Ministry responsible for the site to offer an apology. We welcome any independent review of the consequences of our activity. We will cooperate fully with any investigation.

We take personal responsibility for actions, and are committed to nonviolence. Greenpeace is accountable for its activities and willing to face fair and reasonable consequences.

Dr Kumi Niadoo, the International Executive Director of Greenpeace, will travel to Lima this week, to personally apologise for the offence caused by the activity and represent the organisation in any on going discussions with the Peruvian authorities.

Greenpeace will immediately stop any further use of the offending images.

Skriv snarest til chefredaktøren!

Jeg opfatter Informations debatartikel, der ikke er trykt i papirudgaven, som et sarkastisk forsøg på, at gøre nar af Venstre. Problemet for Information er nok, at den ikke bliver opfattet som sådan af læserne, men derimod som et seriøst indlæg.

Mit gæt er, at de har sloges på Information om det omtalte debatindlæg. Derfor har de lukket for yderligere debat.

Man skal selvfølgelig argumentere mod Klimaskeptikernes mange påstande, men ikke med spin og tåbeligheder. I øvrigt findes der flere godt samlinger af argumenter mod Klimaskeptikerne.

Man bør kontakte chef-reaktionen om hvad meningen er med dette debatindlæg.

Greenpeace undskylder:

Lima is just yet another re-enactment of the three-stage ritual that has become only too familiar over the past 20 years. First, we are treated to months of ludicrously unscientific hype, telling us that the threat of global warming is now worse than ever. Then, they all gather in some agreeable venue, for the "developing" nations – led by China and India – to say they will only play ball if the "developed" world, led by the EU, the US and Japan, pays them $100 billion a year to curb their "carbon emissions". In days of acrimony and stupefying boredom, when the poorer nations bid up the bribe they want (some were this time suggesting it should eventually be £1.5 trillion a year), it emerges that the rich countries aren't really intending to deliver. The mere $1 billion promised to the "Green Climate Fund" by Japan, for instance, is all going to Japanese firms to build three coal-fired power stations in Indonesia.
Finally, at the eleventh hour – or more likely 4 o'clock in the morning – a "breakthrough" is announced. Everyone has finally agreed on a meaningless document that commits no one to anything.
Lima is the 20th time something similar has happened, as it will again in Paris next year. So the dreary farce will continue until the crack of doom – which, like that warming, will never appear as the computer models predicted. Or until they have all died of boredom

Jeg sendte nedenstående e-mail direkte til chefredaktøren på Information, men har ikke fået noget svar...

jeg følger Kosmos opfordring og sender en mail til Christian Jensen

Godt nytår til alle på klimadebat.dk, der på trods af stor uenighed formår (engang imellem med Branners hjælpende hånd) at skabe et fantastisk forum for en god klimadebat med alt det journaliststanden i Dk mangler

Rigtig mange danskere har bemærket, at vejret de seneste fire-fem måneder er blevet gradvist dårligere. Det er gået fra at være domineret af varme og mange solskinstimer til at være præget af regn, slud og kulde.

There's growing evidence that global warming is driving crazy winters

Previous studies have suggested that Arctic amplification has caused planetary-scale waves to elongate meridionally and slow down, resulting in more frequent blocking patterns and extreme weather. Here trends in the meridional extent of atmospheric waves over North America and the North Atlantic are investigated in three reanalyses, and it is demonstrated that previously reported positive trends are likely an artifact of the methodology. No significant decrease in planetary-scale wave phase speeds are found except in October-November-December, but this trend is sensitive to the analysis parameters. Moreover, the frequency of blocking occurrence exhibits no significant increase in any season in any of the three reanalyses, further supporting the lack of trends in wave speed and meridional extent. This work highlights that observed trends in midlatitude weather patterns are complex and likely not simply understood in terms of Arctic amplification alone

Et ganske friskt synspunkt vedr. klimaforandringerne af den tyske meteorolog Klaus Hager

kristofferszilas skrev:
Foxnews skriver Study: Global warming skeptics know more about climate science

Ask- skrev:
Men har svært ved at se hvorfor min kommentar og bruger skal slettets.

Men har svært ved at se hvorfor min kommentar og bruger skal slettes.

No matter how brilliant climate prognosticators are, nor how sophisticated their algorithms and super their computers, they are far from knowing with sufficient certainty the far future.

Det var vist Søren Kierkegaard der sagde: "det eneste jeg ved - det er at jeg ikke ved noget"

Jeg var blot under den opfattelse af at vi faktisk havde ytringsfrihed her i Danmark og at aviser som information tog denne frihed alvorligt