Bæredygtighed?

Marianne Pedersen skrev:
De seneste par dage, har jeg gået og spekuleret på, om der er nogle fordele og ulemper ved bæredygtighed! Derfor vil jeg gerne lige høre jer hvad i mener fordelene og ulemperne er ved bæredygtighed.

Så bæredygtighed kan uden uddybning altså tolkes forholdsvist bredt

Perhaps the most significant new weasel word to have emerged from the UN's equivalent of the Ministry of Truth is "sustainable." Commitment to sustainability is now mouthed by every politician, bureaucrat, marketing executive and media hack on Earth. It sounds so benign, so reasonable, but what it actually means is "bureaucratically controlled and NGO-enforced within a UN-based socialist agenda." Like most aspects of socialism, it is based on incomprehension and/or hatred of the nature and function of market capitalism, not least because markets — which signal scarcity, reward economy and promote profitable innovation — are the only true source of sustainability. Projected catastrophic man-made climate change was enthusiastically embraced by global socialism because it was — in the words of Nicholas Stern, who was ennobled for his manufacture of an egregiously skewed review of climate impacts for his political masters in the U.K. Labour Party — "the greatest market failure the world has ever seen." The problem is that we haven't actually seen it, except, that is, through the biased lens of "official" science and an alarmist crusading media