Den Store Løgn

Den absolut højeste temperatur i Danmark er 36,4°C målt ved Holstebro i august 1975. Den absolut laveste temperatur er -31,2 °C målt i Thy i januar 1982.

En anden britisk klovn:

COP26: Prince Charles says 'time has quite literally run out'

Med til Den Store Løgn hører også bogen..

"Corona, climate narrative and opportunity costs

After the first vaccination campaigns in the corona pandemic, it was reasonable to assume that people would ask themselves questions after the third, fourth or, at the latest, after the fifth vaccination. But this rational assumption cannot be applied when we are dealing with a faith-based model.

In fact, the opposite is true.

Anyone who got Covid after the initial double vaccination could have told themselves the vaccination doesn't work, so I can go without it in future. However, after three years, many vaccinations, lockdowns and countless masks, it is now very difficult to 'opt out'. The opportunity costs are high because you would then have to admit that you had been fooled for years."

"The climate narrative is very similar. We had the naïve assumption that the appeal "Eat bugs to avoid emissions" would cause believers to pause a moment and ask questions. But it didn't happen. Many people have internalized the new end-of-the-world prophecy and its accompanying redemption narrative that the end of the world will not come if only everyone makes enough sacrifices.

The climate change narrative has become a substitute religion. It suddenly offers people who previously had no direction in life a sense of stability and gives their lives meaning. Skipping school, gluing yourself to the asphalt, spraying Christmas trees with red paint, fighting 'fake news' on social media, tracking down and ostracizing dissenters. All these basically pointless activities have become the glue that binds in social networks.

Fighting together against an invisible enemy is the new ideal, right up to the ultimate sacrifice of one's own purpose in life.

It is therefore safe to assume that we will see much crazier developments in the coronavirus & climate belief landscapes in 2024."

John Niclasen skrev:
Der er især to "kriser" med vanvittige "løsninger" i nyere tid:
Klima og Corona-virus.

Det har en person påpeget med flg. tekst:

"Corona, climate narrative and opportunity costs

After the first vaccination campaigns in the corona pandemic, it was reasonable to assume that people would ask themselves questions after the third, fourth or, at the latest, after the fifth vaccination. But this rational assumption cannot be applied when we are dealing with a faith-based model.

In fact, the opposite is true.

Anyone who got Covid after the initial double vaccination could have told themselves the vaccination doesn't work, so I can go without it in future. However, after three years, many vaccinations, lockdowns and countless masks, it is now very difficult to 'opt out'. The opportunity costs are high because you would then have to admit that you had been fooled for years."

"The climate narrative is very similar. We had the naïve assumption that the appeal "Eat bugs to avoid emissions" would cause believers to pause a moment and ask questions. But it didn't happen. Many people have internalized the new end-of-the-world prophecy and its accompanying redemption narrative that the end of the world will not come if only everyone makes enough sacrifices.

The climate change narrative has become a substitute religion. It suddenly offers people who previously had no direction in life a sense of stability and gives their lives meaning. Skipping school, gluing yourself to the asphalt, spraying Christmas trees with red paint, fighting 'fake news' on social media, tracking down and ostracizing dissenters. All these basically pointless activities have become the glue that binds in social networks.

Fighting together against an invisible enemy is the new ideal, right up to the ultimate sacrifice of one's own purpose in life.

It is therefore safe to assume that we will see much crazier developments in the coronavirus & climate belief landscapes in 2024."

Kilde: Too many would have to admit they had been fooled and should have known better @ sott.net

, hvor der også findes link til kilden på twitter.

Robert Wagner skrev:

John Niclasen skrev:
Der er især to "kriser" med vanvittige "løsninger" i nyere tid:
Klima og Corona-virus.

Det har en person påpeget med flg. tekst:

"Corona, climate narrative and opportunity costs

After the first vaccination campaigns in the corona pandemic, it was reasonable to assume that people would ask themselves questions after the third, fourth or, at the latest, after the fifth vaccination. But this rational assumption cannot be applied when we are dealing with a faith-based model.

In fact, the opposite is true.

Anyone who got Covid after the initial double vaccination could have told themselves the vaccination doesn't work, so I can go without it in future. However, after three years, many vaccinations, lockdowns and countless masks, it is now very difficult to 'opt out'. The opportunity costs are high because you would then have to admit that you had been fooled for years."

"The climate narrative is very similar. We had the naïve assumption that the appeal "Eat bugs to avoid emissions" would cause believers to pause a moment and ask questions. But it didn't happen. Many people have internalized the new end-of-the-world prophecy and its accompanying redemption narrative that the end of the world will not come if only everyone makes enough sacrifices.

The climate change narrative has become a substitute religion. It suddenly offers people who previously had no direction in life a sense of stability and gives their lives meaning. Skipping school, gluing yourself to the asphalt, spraying Christmas trees with red paint, fighting 'fake news' on social media, tracking down and ostracizing dissenters. All these basically pointless activities have become the glue that binds in social networks.

Fighting together against an invisible enemy is the new ideal, right up to the ultimate sacrifice of one's own purpose in life.

It is therefore safe to assume that we will see much crazier developments in the coronavirus & climate belief landscapes in 2024."

Kilde: Too many would have to admit they had been fooled and should have known better @ sott.net

, hvor der også findes link til kilden på twitter.

What a bunch of bullshit. The virus mutated, so revacvination was neccessary. It's the same with influenca vaccine. You need to grt e new one each yesr, because the unfuenca virud gas changed.


Desværre er John Niclassen åbenbart ikke klog nok til at kunne gennemskue disse løgne.

Det samme gælder så også AGW deniers løgne.

Robert Wagner skrev:

John Niclasen skrev:
Der er især to "kriser" med vanvittige "løsninger" i nyere tid:
Klima og Corona-virus.

Det har en person påpeget med flg. tekst:

"Corona, climate narrative and opportunity costs

After the first vaccination campaigns in the corona pandemic, it was reasonable to assume that people would ask themselves questions after the third, fourth or, at the latest, after the fifth vaccination. But this rational assumption cannot be applied when we are dealing with a faith-based model.

In fact, the opposite is true.

Anyone who got Covid after the initial double vaccination could have told themselves the vaccination doesn't work, so I can go without it in future. However, after three years, many vaccinations, lockdowns and countless masks, it is now very difficult to 'opt out'. The opportunity costs are high because you would then have to admit that you had been fooled for years."

"The climate narrative is very similar. We had the naïve assumption that the appeal "Eat bugs to avoid emissions" would cause believers to pause a moment and ask questions. But it didn't happen. Many people have internalized the new end-of-the-world prophecy and its accompanying redemption narrative that the end of the world will not come if only everyone makes enough sacrifices.

The climate change narrative has become a substitute religion. It suddenly offers people who previously had no direction in life a sense of stability and gives their lives meaning. Skipping school, gluing yourself to the asphalt, spraying Christmas trees with red paint, fighting 'fake news' on social media, tracking down and ostracizing dissenters. All these basically pointless activities have become the glue that binds in social networks.

Fighting together against an invisible enemy is the new ideal, right up to the ultimate sacrifice of one's own purpose in life.

It is therefore safe to assume that we will see much crazier developments in the coronavirus & climate belief landscapes in 2024."

Kilde: Too many would have to admit they had been fooled and should have known better @ sott.net

, hvor der også findes link til kilden på twitter.

What a bunch of bullshit. The virus mutated, so revacvination was neccessary. It's the same with influenca vaccine. You need to grt e new one each yesr, because the unfuenca virud gas changed.


Desværre er John Niclassen åbenbart ikke klog nok til at kunne gennemskue disse løgne.

Det samme gælder så også AGW deniers løgne.

Robert Wagner skrev:

John Niclasen skrev:
Der er især to "kriser" med vanvittige "løsninger" i nyere tid:
Klima og Corona-virus.

Det har en person påpeget med flg. tekst:

"Corona, climate narrative and opportunity costs

After the first vaccination campaigns in the corona pandemic, it was reasonable to assume that people would ask themselves questions after the third, fourth or, at the latest, after the fifth vaccination. But this rational assumption cannot be applied when we are dealing with a faith-based model.

In fact, the opposite is true.

Anyone who got Covid after the initial double vaccination could have told themselves the vaccination doesn't work, so I can go without it in future. However, after three years, many vaccinations, lockdowns and countless masks, it is now very difficult to 'opt out'. The opportunity costs are high because you would then have to admit that you had been fooled for years."

"The climate narrative is very similar. We had the naïve assumption that the appeal "Eat bugs to avoid emissions" would cause believers to pause a moment and ask questions. But it didn't happen. Many people have internalized the new end-of-the-world prophecy and its accompanying redemption narrative that the end of the world will not come if only everyone makes enough sacrifices.

The climate change narrative has become a substitute religion. It suddenly offers people who previously had no direction in life a sense of stability and gives their lives meaning. Skipping school, gluing yourself to the asphalt, spraying Christmas trees with red paint, fighting 'fake news' on social media, tracking down and ostracizing dissenters. All these basically pointless activities have become the glue that binds in social networks.

Fighting together against an invisible enemy is the new ideal, right up to the ultimate sacrifice of one's own purpose in life.

It is therefore safe to assume that we will see much crazier developments in the coronavirus & climate belief landscapes in 2024."

Kilde: Too many would have to admit they had been fooled and should have known better @ sott.net

, hvor der også findes link til kilden på twitter.

What a bunch of bullshit. The virus mutated, so revacvination was neccessary. It's the same with influenca vaccine. You need to grt e new one each yesr, because the unfuenca virud gas changed.


Desværre er John Niclassen åbenbart ikke klog nok til at kunne gennemskue disse løgne.

Det samme gælder så også AGW deniers løgne.

Robert Wagner skrev:

Robert Wagner skrev:

John Niclasen skrev:
Der er især to "kriser" med vanvittige "løsninger" i nyere tid:
Klima og Corona-virus.

Det har en person påpeget med flg. tekst:

"Corona, climate narrative and opportunity costs

After the first vaccination campaigns in the corona pandemic, it was reasonable to assume that people would ask themselves questions after the third, fourth or, at the latest, after the fifth vaccination. But this rational assumption cannot be applied when we are dealing with a faith-based model.

In fact, the opposite is true.

Anyone who got Covid after the initial double vaccination could have told themselves the vaccination doesn't work, so I can go without it in future. However, after three years, many vaccinations, lockdowns and countless masks, it is now very difficult to 'opt out'. The opportunity costs are high because you would then have to admit that you had been fooled for years."

"The climate narrative is very similar. We had the naïve assumption that the appeal "Eat bugs to avoid emissions" would cause believers to pause a moment and ask questions. But it didn't happen. Many people have internalized the new end-of-the-world prophecy and its accompanying redemption narrative that the end of the world will not come if only everyone makes enough sacrifices.

The climate change narrative has become a substitute religion. It suddenly offers people who previously had no direction in life a sense of stability and gives their lives meaning. Skipping school, gluing yourself to the asphalt, spraying Christmas trees with red paint, fighting 'fake news' on social media, tracking down and ostracizing dissenters. All these basically pointless activities have become the glue that binds in social networks.

Fighting together against an invisible enemy is the new ideal, right up to the ultimate sacrifice of one's own purpose in life.

It is therefore safe to assume that we will see much crazier developments in the coronavirus & climate belief landscapes in 2024."

Kilde: Too many would have to admit they had been fooled and should have known better @ sott.net

, hvor der også findes link til kilden på twitter.

What a bunch of bullshit. The virus mutated, so revacvination was neccessary. It's the same with influenca vaccine. You need to grt e new one each yesr, because the unfuenca virud gas changed.


Desværre er John Niclassen åbenbart ikke klog nok til at kunne gennemskue disse løgne.

Det samme gælder så også AGW deniers løgne.

Og nej, heller lige genposte CO2 for hundrede gang end at have denne pinlighed stående...

John Niclasen skrev:
I fortsættelse af Keeling 23-Dec-2023 23-12-2023 17:17

Med til Den Store Løgn hører også påstanden, at der er for meget CO2 i atmosfæren.

Iflg. Keelingkurven er koncentrationen af CO2 i atmosfæren igen steget til nu 422,85 ppm (godt 0,042%). Det er stadig historisk lidt i geologisk forstand, da der tidligere var langt mere af denne planteføde i atmosfæren og havene.

Vedhæftede graf viser de seneste 70 mio. år.

Livet har gennem mio. af år suget CO2 ud af atmosfæren og oceanerne, og det er nu fortrinsvis gemt som kalksten (CaCO3).

Vi gør livet på Jorden en kæmpe tjeneste ved at udlede mere og mere CO2 i atmosfæren.

Til skeptikere overfor det pseudovidenskabelige nonsens og politiske aktivisme, vi er vidner til, og dem som er interesseret i rigtig videnskab: Glædelig Jul!

John Niclasen skrev:
Med til Den Store Løgn hører også at gentage de samme mindre løgne igen og igen i en uendelighed, selvom løgnene er solidt tilbagevist som værende løgne.

Det gælder f.eks. påstanden om, at iskappen i Grønland mister masse.

Man justerer ikke for Glacial Isostatic Adjustment. Det er gennemgået i en række indlæg, hvor dette er det sidste:

Glacial Isostatic Adjustment afrunding 06-11-2023 13:15

Klima-vanviddet er det største og dyreste bedrag i historien!
Det bliver bl.a. holdt igang af aktivister, der spammer deres løgne mange steder på nettet, hvor de får lov til det.

John Niclasen skrev:
Men til Den Store Løgn hører også sletning af historiske data.

Tony Heller har en ny video, hvor han viser, hvordan man sletter historiske temperaturrekorder denne gang i Australien:

Erasing Australia @ YouTube

Klima-vanviddet er det største og dyreste bedrag i historien.
Hvordan stopper vi vanviddet?

Ole Larsen skrev:
Tony Heller er en god mand. Han giver os klimaskeptikere et bredere perspektiv. Og hvad er det med at trække udtalelser tilbage? Det har jeg sgu aldrig hørt. Er vi ude i noget heksejagt eller jødeforfølgelse, hvor sandheden ikke betyder så meget. Nå, jeg var på indkøb i dag. Og er der mon nogen i Danmark der ville være kede af hvis sneen og isen smeltede nu? Og her til Jul havde jeg en sædvanlig dårlig økologisk oplevelse. Det kneb med sødmælk op til Jul, så jeg købte 2 liter økologisk sødmælk. Den sidste åbnede jeg dagen efter sidste salgsdag, og først var der en lille klump i, da jeg skulle have noget senere var det blevet tykt. Jeg ved godt at datoen var overskredet, men resten af året køber jeg 5 liter mælk én gang om ugen, og jeg kikker aldrig på datoen, og der er aldrig noget i vejen.

Er vi ude i noget heksejagt eller jødeforfølgelse, hvor sandheden ikke betyder så meget

In many ways, it is incredible they got away with it for so long. For the past decade or so, mainstream politicians across Europe have stopped promising to improve their voters' living standards. Instead, they have boasted about their plans to limit them. They have extolled the virtues of a higher cost of living, deindustrialisation and restrictions on personal freedoms. And they expected most people wouldn't mind or perhaps even notice – because all this was to be done in the name of 'saving the planet' from climate change. But in 2023, that elite green consensus came crashing down to Earth...

Kosmos skrev:

Er vi ude i noget heksejagt eller jødeforfølgelse, hvor sandheden ikke betyder så meget

- ja, der er ingen pardon til kættere mod Klimakirkens hellige dogmer!

Men nu ser det ud til, at 'protestanterne' omsider er ved at have fået nok og så småt begynder at tage têten:

In many ways, it is incredible they got away with it for so long. For the past decade or so, mainstream politicians across Europe have stopped promising to improve their voters' living standards. Instead, they have boasted about their plans to limit them. They have extolled the virtues of a higher cost of living, deindustrialisation and restrictions on personal freedoms. And they expected most people wouldn't mind or perhaps even notice – because all this was to be done in the name of 'saving the planet' from climate change. But in 2023, that elite green consensus came crashing down to Earth...